An Open Letter To President Obama - Seeking Unity But Sowing Disunity

An Open Letter To President Obama - Seeking Unity But Sowing Disunity

I construct your words on national unity, at the end of your recent speech on the Afghanistan war, both empty and frustrating:
" This vast and mixed citizenry will not always subscribe on every question – nor should we. But I also know that we, as a country, cannot sustain our leadership nor navigate the thrust challenges of our time if we confess ourselves to be split asunder by the corresponding animosity and disbelief and nepotism that has in recent times poisoned our national discourse.
It is easy to forget that when this fighting began, we were united – bound together by the fresh subconsciousness of a funky dirty deed, and by the determination to defend our homeland and the values we hold dear. I refuse to accept the conviction that we cannot tell that unity and. I take it with every fiber of my being that we – as Americans – can still come together behind a common purpose. For our values are not cleverly words written into parchment – they are a creed that calls us together, and that has carried us through the darkest of storms as one nation, one people. "
Here you are happy and yearning for unity but your actions and silence strew disunity:
- When Americans were rising up and demanding answers to unclear health care reform issues and legislation, you condescended to those in disagreement and told them to stop " quarrel ", as if they were children dust over the last piece of cake.
- When Air Force One and an accompanying Air Force warrior made very low flight passes over New York City, causing trepidation and anxiety in those New Yorkers on the ground who were reliving the dangerous memories of the 9 - 11 attacks, you displayed an snooty insensitivity by working the incident into a quip you told several days successive at a gala.
- When Nancy Pelosi called those in disagreement with health care reform plans " un - American ", you were silent.
- When Democratic Congressman Grayson of Florida called all Republicans " knuckle dragging Neanderthals ", you were silent.
- When one of your czars, Van Jones, called all Republicans a - - h - - - s in a public forum in Berkley that was captured on videotape and YouTube, you were silent.
- When Henry Reid stated publicly that American tourists, the very taxpayers that pay Congressional salaries, physically smell when they visit the nation ' s Money in the summer, your were silent.
- When Pelosi and Reid and a small cabal of Democrats took the health care reform legislation exertion behind closed doors and into quick, no review votes, bypassing formal, cardinal, and democratic debate, you were silent.
- While you graciously and quickly accepted the penitence of Congressman Joe Wilson who yelled out " Liar " during your health care speech to Congress, when Pelosi went for a tremble of votary flesh by censuring the Congressman, you were silent.
- When ACORN came beneath contemplation for voter registration and child prostitution shenanigans and maul of taxpayer money, you were silent.
National unity usually manifests itself in one of two ways. First, an racy tragedy agnate as the foray on Treasure Harbor or the 9 - 11 attacks can trouble a state together. Second, a great leader matching as Churchill in World Cold war II or President Kennedy ' s Camelot vision can act the citizenry together for a greater purpose. However, allowing person riffraff to be called a - - h - - - s, un - American, smelly, knuckle dragging Neanderthals is no way to become a great superintendent of a unified nation. By utterance to American adults as if they were children, telling them to stop disputation when they were only freely telling their opinions and concerns is no way to become a great principal of a unified nation. Making light of American fears by telling a witticism about an incident that negatively impacted a lot of people is no way to become a great chief of a unified nation.
In less than a year you went from an scrutiny ranking over 70 % to an trial evaluating beneath 50 %, not through you made difficult and indomitable decisions but whereas your were silent, condescending, and insensitive. Not unlike a high proof evaluating provided an unprecedented opportunity at national unity that you lust for. You mislaid that historic opportunity when you went from being the aspiration for a better national future to becoming just higher supporter politician undifferentiated the rest of the political class in Washington. What a dishonour.

An Open Letter To President Obama On Health Care Reform And What It Means To My Family

An Open Letter To President Obama On Health Care Reform And What It Means To My Family

Mr. President:
I know that you are a very busy man so I will try to keep my questions about health care reform and the recently passed legislation as short and simple as possible.
- I could ask you why you consider this is a good piece of legislation even though I truly think that it will be a lapse and will come very close to bankrupting the country. The basis for my conclusion has crumb to do with political partiality ( in fact, I have never voted for a Republican for national office in my life. ) From my perspective, " Obama Care " never effectively addressed the root causes of our escalating health care costs: Americans eat too much of the askew kinds of food, they exercise far too little, they are portly, they smoke too much, and they are getting older. This legislation does not label these causes, it just raises taxes and moves money around within the bureaucracy. I could ask you about this but I will not.
- I could ask you why you have not stepped forward and denounced those in your party that have likened Americans matching myself, i. e. those that have legitimate and honest concerns about this health care reform bill, to the racists who fought against the civil rights movement from the 1960s. I thought that we lived in a free country where riffraff could freely inscription their elected representatives without being slurred in the most debasing way possible, just for having a different thought. Your want of ideal to oppose those Democrats who frequently use the term " racist " to defame myself and those Americans eloquent their honest opposition, cheapens the honour and contributions of those from long ago that fought actual racism. I could ask you about this but I will not.
- I could ask you why you felt it essential to pass this legislation by the back door called reconciliation. This is a major, major subject in the country that will affect every American for decades to come. Tricky it in the back door, without using the typical, time noble fashion of passing laws in his country, belittles the approach and makes it survey equivalent it was forced through without the full weight of the democratic process behind it. I could ask you about this but I will not.
Here is what I will ask you about. But first, some reality facts:
- Let me reiterate that both my wife and myself have never voted for a Republican for national office in our lives.
- We both spent several decades of our lives working oppressive for AT&T, respectful several years ago, secure in our thinking that AT&T ' s promise of health care benefits and coverage for our long years of service was a good pledge.
- We both try to eat well, we exercise at our local YMCA on an halfway daily basis, neither of us smoke, and we rarely drink. In other words, we take personal onus for our health and our health care.
One cause for our personal restraint behavior is that we are on a high deductible insurance plan with AT&T. We are each obliged for the first $1, 200 of our annual health care costs before we get any insurance coverage at all. However, for this personal guilt, we also pay nothingness in annual premiums.
- During the debate leading up to the passage of health care reform, you reiterated more than once that those of us that currently had health care coverage would be able to keep it. However, in a recent article in Fortune magazine, the CEO of AT&T, Randall Stephenson, was interviewed ( several pages of the article are attached ). Towards the end of the evening, he was explicitly asked whether AT&T would consider dropping health care insurance coverage for its employees and retirees. His response made it halcyon that this was a very feasible option for two reasons. First, from a business profitability perspective, underneath the new health care reform law, " you ' re better off paying the government a fine and dropping health care coverage for your employees ", cooperative AT&Ts bottom line. Second, he talks about " economic caliber " which appears to be code words for " if others in his industry do it, AT&T will have no choice but to do it also. "
Thus, a few quick questions for you:
1 ) Were you just ingenuous when you made the comments that we could all keep our current health care insurance, not theorization the simple reality that companies are in business to make money and if this bill makes it easier for them to make more money by not insuring their workforce, that is what they will do? Or were you being disingenuous, knowing that this would happen and deliberately misinforming the country to help get your health care reform bill passed? Childlike or disingenuous, in either case you will be making millions of American voters dejected in November and in 2012 when we are forced out of our current health care coverage and will blame you for either teens or arrogance in this locality.
2 ) I am 57 years senile and my wife is 56 years senile and if Mr. Stephenson does decide to eliminate AT&T ' s health care coverage for employees and retirees, where do you give incentive that my wife and I get coverage? What insurance company is big idea to want to assemble us up, and millions of other older Americans who wandering their coverage, at our ages even though we are both healthy and taking personal restraint for our spread out good health?
3 ) If we are forced out onto the market for health care insurance coverage, our new coverage is likely vitality to be much more invaluable. Our annual health care costs will go from a maximum of $1, 200 each to a minimum of several thousand dollars each. Is this how you later to reduce health care costs for middle class America? Is so, then you need to diagram the math to me. Maximum of $1, 200 to a minimum of several thousand dollars, does not make morale out here in the real world. How does this reduce the escalating health care costs for the 90 % of Americans that coeval had health care insurance religious to the corridor of this bill?
Thus, I am not vigor to ask you about why you and the run on of Congress did not inscription the root causes of high health care costs in your legislating process. I am not flurry to ask why you have sat back and been silent while those Americans with legitimate and honest dissent against this bill have been likened to racists by members of your party. I thought you represented all Americans, not just those that agreed with your policies. I will not ask you about why you did not have the courage and kick to pass this legislation the right way, through the front door equal every other piece of legislation, but instead snuck it through the back door of reconciliation.
However, I will ask you or your staff to contact me and construe where and how I can get health care coverage at my age if AT&T and the rest of corporate America decides it is a better economic choice to pay a government fine than to cover their employees and retirees with health insurance. I will ask you to render whether you were childlike or disingenuous when explaining that we would be able to keep our current health insurance coverage. And ultimately, please diagram how paying no more than $1, 200 a year unbefitting my current coverage ( with many years paying zippo for coverage during healthy years ) is a better deal then verdict new coverage at my age and paying several thousand dollars a year for the privilege.
Although I have written to the Light Building many times, I have never known any answer to my questions on a wide variety of topics even though you promised to have the most open and responsive administration of all time. That has not happened yet. However, in this case I do desire, in detail I demand specific answers to my three questions sizable. For your political sake I fortune to receive those answers before early November and certainly before 2012.
Thank you for your time,
Walter " Bruno " Korschek
[Follow up note: a month after sending this to the Silvery Shack, no answers to the questions have been patent or even a simple pop quiz that this letter was established has been unfolding from the Obama adminstration. ]