Health Scandal Of The Decade – Monsanto’s Gmo Perversion Of Food

Health Scandal Of The Decade – Monsanto’s Gmo Perversion Of Food

It is the meridian of an astonishing scandal that has been steadily building over the recent decade. During this time Monsanto’s mutated seeds have grown to 90 % of the U. S. soy crop and 85 % of the corn crop – and wheat is next on their agenda. Their efforts have been marked by corporate bullying and have tense the attention of the Rectitude Department who is conducting an antitrust investigation. All the while they have been spending millions on lobbying to fast course their agenda before the American public even realizes what hit them. Europeans are pitch about the deprivation of safety testing for this newest Monsanto experiment. Monsanto is making an minatory aptitude play to corner the worldwide market on food and seeds. In the process they are adversely alteration the very type of food itself.
Few people would eat Monsanto’s “food” if they implied what it was or knew that they were eating it. President Obama and his family won’t eat it. Neither did the Hodgepodge family. Even a Monsanto employee cafeteria rejects it. This is no gleeful matter. Your health and the health of your children and grandchildren are at stake. It seems more allied a scene from a horror flick than something happening in modern day America. Project your digestive tract turned into a Roundup herbicide workshop and other screwed up genetic signals slowly and progressively bad away your health. Unlike acute food poisoning from infectious E. coli, it is a slow and artful poisoning.
Why GMO Food is Dangerous
Monsanto’s GMO ( genetically modified symmetry ) technology inserts non - food genes, genes from other sort, into the DNA of food, adjustment the very stuff of food itself. In some cases these genes make the crops more tolerant to the Roundup herbicide made by Monsanto and in other cases the genes abnormally create the DNA of food cells to produce toxic proteins that act as pesticides.
Most people are not propertied with the conceptualization of modification the being of food in a grand genetic experiment with uncelebrated consequences. The idea of food trenchant its own internal toxin is equally abhorrent. After all, who wants to eat toxic food? Even fewer stock this technology in the hands of Monsanto, a company with a history of blatant disregard for human health. It was Monsanto that knowingly poisoned the planet with toxic PCBs.
The process of making GMO seeds also poses health risks. Viral expounder genes are used during this production process and become part of the DNA mix, posing a risk for new types of viral disease. An unintended side - effect of this production technology is chronic activation or suppression of normal genes in the modified plants. This alters the actual nutrient structure of food and the function of the proteins within that food – a very serious matter.
The entire process of practical GMO seeds is also unpredictable. It creates multiple serendipitous genetic events in every food cell invaded by the mutant genes. Considering each gene doesn’t just do one thing and is highly interactive with other genes, the production of GMO food is not consistent and ergo safety cannot be guaranteed – especially when you sense that our scientific letters of gene interdependencies is in its origin.
Eating food that is mutated by other non - food style is a grand experiment to claim the headmost. GMO mutants can transfer to the living bacteria in your digestive tract, as has been shown in repelling experiments. This can adversely pocket money the way your extirpate bacteria behave so that they create pesticides and become more resistant to your unaffected system and medical treatments. If the GMO mutants were to transfer to an existing infection in your digestive tract then it could create your own superbug.
Because the proteins in GMO food are structurally different than normal food they significantly increase the risk for allergy. Allergy is one skeleton of inflammation that is likely to termination from GMO food, but there are many other implied sources. These contain the mis - metabolism of the food, the inherent toxicity of the food, and the pesticide residues on the food. These inflammatory problems of GMO food will additively contribute to other forms of inflammation agnate as pollution and stress and add to the total inflammation burden sets the stage for many diseases. It is likely that GMO food will have a significant impact on pregnancy problems and developmental problems in children. At this time nobody can rule out GMO as a possible causative instrument in Autism, as the rates of both have risen together. A recent re - evaluation of data provided by Monsanto showed that various types of GMO corn caused significant inflammatory organ damage to rats.
It has now been shown that the health consequence of eating high amounts of Roundup residue that is being sprayed in ever - higher amounts on GMO crops is the disruption of your endocrine system. A recent study shows that these residues of Roundup are highly interactive with sex hormones and significantly disrupt their function.
A 2008 Austrian government study showed that feeding GMO corn to mice for multiple generations resulted in fertility issues and flimsy kidneys, as well as changes in metabolic pathways involved with inflammation, cholesterol, and protein. Here is a link to the 105 page report.
GMO crops are also too much and adversely adaption soil quality. In reality, soil animals relating as earthworms are now found to have incorporated GMO mutant corn genes into their cells. This accommodation is of highest importance to plausible human health problems. There is certainly zot preventing this from happening to humans.
For more information on the devastating health consequences of consuming GMO foods scrutinize Jeffrey Smith’s books, Seeds of Terminological inexactitude and Genetic Roulette. ”
You may be fear the precise; if GMOs are so dangerous to eat then why are they allowed in the food supply?
Corporate Cronyism - A Loathsome FDA Places the Public in Danger
We now know that FDA scientists originally working on the point of the safety of GMO food had considerable concerns that included allergies, toxins, adverse nutritional effects, and new diseases. They urged long - term studies but were ignored by FDA management who instead decided that GMO food was “substantially equivalent” to normal food. In 1992 these managers issued the following policy statement in the Federal Register, “The agency is not aware of any information exposition that foods derived by these new methods differ from other foods in any meaningful or uniform way. ” In retrospect, that policy, which stands to this day, was a flat out distortion and a perfidious betrayal of the public entrustment.
Court cases have forced into public view the documents heavy the concerns of the FDA scientists. You can study them all at this link to the BioIntegrity. Org website. In gospel, rushing GMO foods to market also represents a serious breach of scientific honestness by the overall research community.
Today, the FDA is a world skipper in proteomic technology, the spick-and-span analysis of protein structure and function. Italian researchers using proteomics have nowadays proven beyond any question that GMO food is so genetically different from normal food that it cannot perhaps be considered substantially equivalent. Certainly the FDA could discover this actuality for themselves in a matter of hours. Why are FDA scientists in bracelets and not taking movement?
Part of the FDA management team’s culture of corruption is a revolving door with the various companies they are supposed to be regulating, the very definition of corporate cronyism. These shenanigans have had the catch effect of the FDA theatre primarily as a police force bully representing various powerful lobbies that buy protection and marketing favors, while stomping on the rights of the little guys congeneric organic family farms and consumers. In the case of food, Monsanto wins the gold medal for influence pedaling at the assessment of human health.
One of the more egregious examples of cronyism is Michael Taylor. He was an FDA staff lawyer and Executive Assistant to the FDA Commissioner from 1976 to 1981. From 1981 to 1991 he worked at the law firm of King and Spaulding, dramaturgy as Monsanto’s lawyer and lobbyist. He was a major pleader for overturning the Delaney Clause, a 1958 law prohibiting the introduction of known carcinogens to clear foods, a law Monsanto hated and which was eventually tipped over by Clinton in 1996. His main trust during this time was gaining regulatory whack of Monsanto’s genetically modified cancer - causing bovine advancement hormone ( rBGH ).
To complete his efforts on the bovine gain hormone question Taylor went back to work for the FDA in 1991 with the duration Deputy Commissioner for Policy at the Food and Drug Administration. He was at once in charge for writing the FDA policy on “substantial equivalence” which initially ushered in the rBGH era and to this day enables Monsanto to market its GMO mutated food with no adapted restriction by the FDA as to safety. He also formulated policy that prevented milk producers from informing consumers that their milk was free of bovine advance hormone – intentionally preventing consumers from being able to tell what was in the milk product they were harsh.
After accomplishing his blacken work, he isolated the FDA in 1994 and went to work for Monsanto as Vice President for Public Policy, working on Monsanto’s long gamut plans. More recently, he became a Senior Man at Resources for the Future ( RFF ) and Model of the Risk, Resources and Environmental Management rift. In this role, he strategized how to get Monsanto’s GMO crops into Africa, working closely with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. He also worked closely with the Bush Administration, and is the point person in rasher an finest agenda to vanity GMO seeds and biotech pipe dream around the world.
You guessed it – now he is back at the FDA in a new proclivity the Obama Administration created – Senior Advisor to the Commissioner, working primarily on issues of food safety! “I am gleeful to welcome Mike Taylor back to the FDA, ” Commissioner of Food and Drugs Margaret A. Hamburg, M. D., uttered in announcing Taylor’s appointment. “His expertise and leadership on food safety issues will help the agency to develop and machine the prevention based strategy we need to make sure the safety of the food we eat. ”
As Monsanto, in anti - competitive collusion with Dow, takes their new GMO toxic and mutated corn to market, stacked with eight genes, it should come as no surprise that unquestionably no safety testing is being required by the FDA. Never before have there been eight genes different simultaneously within the cells of food. One gene is bad enough. Three is horrendous. But eight? The reality that the FDA is not requiring extensive safety testing by independent sources of this highly unpredictable and dangerous technology is dubious. It is a grim day when the fox is in charge of the henhouse.
There Is No Good Reason for Monsanto’s GMOs
If you listen to Monsanto and their business cohorts allied as Cargill, they state they are trying to feed the world. In actuality, the world could eliminate Monsanto’s mutated food tomorrow and it would be a better village. It could also do without Cargill drama as an unregulated food tycoon, profiting on the domination of food sales at the appraisal of farmers in a way that is every bit as bad as the worst of Wall Conduct. There is no need for Monsanto’s GMO mutated seeds. They offer no advantages. It is an industry being propped up by unelected bureaucrats and elected officials on the recipient end of Monsanto’s multi - million dollar lobbying operation.
Michael Taylor is one example of corporate crony influence, there are many others. The USDA is profiting from Monsanto’s seeds that cannot be used the next growing season ( the Terminator attribute of the dilemma ). The EPA’s failing to regulate the amounts of Roundup used on food is yet wider scandal. It’s all about profits and control – while undermining the world’s farmers and the biodiversity and sustainability of crops.
Contrary to the Monsanto and Cargill score, GMO technology does not increase crop yields, as has been fully documented in the Union of Concerned Scientists report ritzy Blunder to Profit. And GMO crops are very bad for the carbon copy footprint.
The reality that the Obama administration is actively forwarding Monsanto’s efforts should be a grave care to every American. Of course, the last 16 years of Clinton and Tangle also did everything in their potentiality to help Monsanto. No wonder Americans are fed up. Politicians in both parties are beholden to the golden hero, not the best health interests of its society.
Take Back Our Food – Append the Fight
We the people can have a huge impact and we can chicken feed this serious threat to human health. Don’t buy GMOs food. GMOs soak corn and soy products, beet sugar is now mutated, and wheat is next in line. If you aren’t categorical how to avoid GMO foods and brands then follow the advice accustomed on Jeffrey Smith’s Non - GMO shopping guide. Demand from your political representatives that all GMO food be labeled as containing GMOs. This isn’t just a political theory – this is about your personal health and the future of food.
Watch this humorous and informative animation and pass it on to your friends: Larry Leptin & Family in Invasion of the Frankenfoods.